Methodology
How we score.
We score every supplier on five criteria. Weights reflect how often each criterion actually breaks for buyers — not what's easiest to evaluate.
| Criterion | Weight |
|---|---|
| Purity data transparency | 30% |
| Certificate of Analysis per lot | 25% |
| Shipping practices | 15% |
| Customer support | 15% |
| Refund policy | 15% |
Purity data transparency (30%)
Does the supplier publish HPLC chromatograms — not just purity percentages? Are mass-spec results attached? Is the testing wavelength disclosed? A ">99% pure" claim with no underlying chromatogram is roughly worthless.
Certificate of Analysis per lot (25%)
The COA must be lot-specific. A single reused COA across multiple batches scores zero in this category. Bonus for COAs that include counter-ion identity, peptide content (vs gross mass), and endotoxin/bioburden figures.
Shipping practices (15%)
Cold-chain packaging where the peptide warrants it. Ship times under 7 days domestic. Reasonable international policy. Discreet packaging where customers prefer it.
Customer support (15%)
Email response under 24 hours. Live chat or phone if reachable. Response quality measured by whether they can answer technical questions about COA fields without escalating.
Refund policy (15%)
Clear, written refund policy on the site. Reasonable window. Honored without friction when invoked. Suppliers with no published policy score below 5.
What we don't score
- "Brand reputation" — too gameable
- Anecdotal customer reviews on third-party sites
- Social media presence
- Marketing aesthetics
Conflict of interest
Vial Verdict earns affiliate commissions when readers purchase through some supplier links. We disclose affiliate status on every review. Scores are not adjustable by suppliers — paid or otherwise.